<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Commentaires sur : Point Godwin Poppérien</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hadyba.wordpress.com/2012/08/24/point-godwin-popperien/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hadyba.wordpress.com/2012/08/24/point-godwin-popperien/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:23:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Par : mamadu</title>
		<link>http://hadyba.wordpress.com/2012/08/24/point-godwin-popperien/#comment-2777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mamadu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hadyba.wordpress.com/?p=2639#comment-2777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interressant! Ça ressemble fort à un point Goodwin. Est-il jamais raisonable de (auto)censurer la raison pour des considérations morales ou éthiques? Je pense qu&#039;on le fait très souvent.

Did Popper fear that we would consider (physical) reality as non accessible, hence its consideration irrelevant for all practical purposes in science and technology, and that as a consequence, science and most importantly technology could be practiced without reference to their impact in that reality which we happen to have thrown out with the bath water?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interressant! Ça ressemble fort à un point Goodwin. Est-il jamais raisonable de (auto)censurer la raison pour des considérations morales ou éthiques? Je pense qu&rsquo;on le fait très souvent.</p>
<p>Did Popper fear that we would consider (physical) reality as non accessible, hence its consideration irrelevant for all practical purposes in science and technology, and that as a consequence, science and most importantly technology could be practiced without reference to their impact in that reality which we happen to have thrown out with the bath water?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
